In reply to @RichardElwes

@RichardElwes I suppose my perspective is that the point of saying something is in 'polar form' is that you can read off the magnitude and argument.
'1' is equivalent by algebraic shuffling to '1⋅exp(0i)', but you have to know some facts about 1 to know what the argument is.

1 favourite 0 retweets

View this tweet on twitter.com

This tweet as JSON